COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO MICHAEL RAMSAY WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

On July 26, 2022, Ramsay filed a Notice of Application for judicial review of the Decision on the grounds that the Board breached its duty of procedural fairness by deliberating in camera and being tainted by the Chair’s actual and reasonably apprehended bias, and the Decision was unreasonable because the reasons were inadequate and the Board failed to conduct a proportionality balancing exercise. [...] 137(1) and (2) of the Courts of Justice Act and the governing legal test for departing from the presumption of court openness in finding that the Redacted Materials ought to remain redacted in the Court’s public record. [...] THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE will be used at the hearing of the motion: (a) the Order and Decision of the Divisional Court, made on December 7, 2023; (b) the Record of Proceedings; (c) the Moving Party’s Application Record on the Application; and such further and other evidence as counsel may advise and this Court may permit. [...] On July 26, 2022, Ramsay filed a Notice of Application for judicial review of the Decision on the grounds that the Board breached its duty of procedural fairness by deliberating in camera and being tainted by the Chair’s actual and reasonably apprehended bias, and the Decision was unreasonable because the reasons were inadequate and the Board failed to conduct a proportionality balancing exercise. [...] 137(1) and (2) of the Courts of Justice Act and the governing legal test for departing from the presumption of court openness in finding that the Redacted Materials ought to remain redacted in the Court’s public record.