cover image: 23-235 FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (06/13/2024

20.500.12592/251njiv

23-235 FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (06/13/2024

12 Jun 2024

The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. [...] ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT [June 13, 2024] JUSTICE KAVANAUGH delivered the opinion of the Court. [...] Article III of the Constitution confines the jurisdiction of federal courts to “Cases” and “Controversies.” The case or controversy requirement limits the role of the Federal Judiciary in our system of separated powers. [...] Standing also “tends to assure that the legal questions presented to the court will be resolved, not in the rarified atmosphere of a debating society, but in a concrete factual context conducive to a realistic appreciation of the consequences of judicial action.” Valley Forge, 454 U. [...] As those cases illustrate, to establish causation, the plaintiff must show a predictable chain of events leading from the government action to the asserted injury—in other words, that the government action has caused or likely will cause injury in fact to the plaintiff.2 —————— 2 In cases of alleged future injuries to unregulated parties from government regulation, the causation requirement and th.
Pages
38
Published in
Canada