cover image: CIGI Paper No. 307 — October 2024 - Obstructive Warfare

CIGI Paper No. 307 — October 2024 - Obstructive Warfare

23 Oct 2024

To that end, Patrick Allen (1995, 22) states that, “The air-to- and the Limitations of ground assessment processes need to be sensitive to the posture and type of the attacked units.” In Technology order to win in future wars, Western militaries will require robust and resilient land forces The war in Ukraine has provided the defence and that can address the unique challenges of land security stud. [...] This is done to illustrate the discontinuities The thrust behind the majority of these between the logic of land wars and the theories commentators’ arguments is that long-range fires and practical outcomes of stand-off warfare. [...] Thus, unless states are willing to maintain war- footing stocks during peacetime, the risk of Fourth, technologists and futurists like to posit AI-enabled kill chains operating at the speed of that AI, in the form of autonomous and semi- information and burning through a state’s on- autonomous combat systems and sensors (both hand and reserve stockpile of munitions in the active and passive), will. [...] the theatre of conflict and the manner in which armies travel to the land war; that is, the → Armies must be capable of protecting challenges of land warfare are relevant in both populations. [...] operations through the networking of sensors to detect threats, identify target locations and Land wars, which will remain the most important push the resulting data through the network to type of war in the future, provide many areas allow military commanders to employ the best in which AI can be used to maximize gains and weapon system against the target to generate a offset losses.

Mentioned Organizations

Pages
28
Published in
Canada
Title in English
CIGI Paper No. 307 — October 2024 - Obstructive Warfare [from PDF fonts]