Special Report - Developing a Framework for Collective Data Rights - Jeni Tennison

The scenarios groups to shape the design and operation of a data or selected had to cover different areas of the law and: AI system prior to and during deployment; ʬ be plausible in the near term (rather than fantastical); ʬ ex post redress, to provide for communities and ʬ involve decision making that is significantly automated; groups to gain redress for any harms caused by the use of the system. [...] Will the community be informed about the impacts of Ongoing information about the impacts of the system, to inform the system? legal action and debate about any changes to the system. [...] ʬ How should minoritized groups be represented in decision making? The report recommended that communities have both the “right to derive economic and other value and Community Consent maximizing data’s benefits for the community” and the “right to eliminate or minimize harms from the data to The first ex ante collective data rights to consider are the community” (ibid., para 7.1). [...] To do this, the report recommends by the Indigenous data rights community, and the the creation and recognition of “data trustees” — public notion of “nothing about us without us” (from the Latin sector or non-profit organizations that represent a Nihil de nobis, sine nobis, a slogan popularized in the community — who are given the right to request data English language by the disability rights co. [...] In the first, a local community could not justify the use of data in one of these could gather data about the level and experience of ways — most likely indicating a situation where crime in the area, and perceptions of police presence, the legitimate interests of the organization do not to supplement or challenge the official crime statistics outweigh individual or collective interests.