According to a General Comment issued in September 2011 by the UN Human Rights Committee, the official body responsible for overseeing States’ compliance with their ICCPR obligations: States parties should consider the decriminalization of defamation and, in any case, the application of the criminal law should on. [...] providing for damages for defamation) is effective in protecting the legitimate interest (in this case reputations) a criminal prohibition cannot be justified. [...] It is noteworthy that many democracies – including East Timor, Georgia, Ghana, Sri Lanka, the United Kingdom and the United States – have rescinded their criminal defamation laws, while others have done away with the possibility of imprisonment for defamation. [...] For copyright, despite the growing clamour among content- ‐producers for harsh penalties, better practice suggests that criminal penalties should be reserved for only the most serious offenders, and particularly commercial offenders. [...] These systems have advantages both for the genera public, as self- ‐regulatory systems are far more accessible for ordinary citizens than the courts, and for the media, inasmuch as it is a quicker and less onerous means of resolving breaches of professional standards.
- Pages
- 2
- Published in
- Canada