P S - FRONTIER CENTRE I

The evidence argument) in favour of the origin of SARS- and data in support of the pangolin theory, CoV-2 in the Wuhan Institute of Virology is at she said, “are largely suspicious and likely all persuasive, the next element in the puzzle fraudulent. [...] This they have been unable to do, which leads to There was one obvious exception to the general the obvious conclusion: “From the outset of credulity among the nations of the world to COVID-19’s outbreak, the WHO’s obligation accept the PRC’s and WHO’s assurances on to prepare the world was subordinated to its the absence of early awareness of human-to- leadership’s determination to protect China. [...] Downplaying Chinese deflect responsibility for the spread of the responsibility may also have been a result virus.66 As Richard Shimooka noted, “with of the behaviour of WHO officials such as the virus having ravaged through Europe and Canadian Bruce Aylward, the team leader of now the United States, China has attempted the joint mission between the WHO and the to position itself as the global lea. [...] like Tedros, is a graduate of the University of Nottingham—has never emphasized the As for the government of Canada, led by a origin of the virus or the appalling behaviour person whose admiration of the PRC has been of Chinese officials. [...] Specifically, the reporter had asked Hajdu for the Canadian Despite the best efforts of the WHO and their government’s response to observations supporters in the government of Canada, by American intelligence officials that the the malign reality is that China’s role in the Chinese statistics were worthless.