cover image: MG0022 narrative review of multistakeholder involvement 6 June_SFH posting

20.500.12592/77cp49

MG0022 narrative review of multistakeholder involvement 6 June_SFH posting

6 Jun 2022

Address 122 conflict of interest barriers with a code of conduct and a transparent conflict of interest policy and 123 breach of trust procedure.31 2 124 Confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements can help manage the risk of sharing confidential 125 commercial information and support transparency among stakeholders.22 126 There are opportunities and risks of virtual engagement. [...] Some HTA bodies are unclear on the difference between definitions of 201 patient versus member of the public.3 202 External stakeholders who do not directly interact with HTA processes (such as the public, 203 regulatory agencies, political bodies, and the judiciary) may challenge the autonomy of decisions 204 and recommendations.13 205 206 Examples of multistakeholder engagement 207 208 This se. [...] 244 Afterward 245 Answers to the open-ended questions in the survey, the discussion results of the break-out sessions, 246 and the consensus discussion were analyzed qualitatively. [...] 265 In Workshop 1, stakeholders committed to their involvement and the modelling team embraced the 266 value of the co-production process. [...] 286 Expert roundtable on how to apply the evidence to the real world: This is a semi-structured 287 discussion with manufacturers about the clinical and economic considerations of the intervention.

Authors

KimB

Pages
10
Published in
Canada