cover image: Technology-Facilitated Mind Hacking: Protection of Inner Freedoms in Canadian Law

20.500.12592/zgmsh9v

Technology-Facilitated Mind Hacking: Protection of Inner Freedoms in Canadian Law

26 Jan 2024

In contrast, the UDHR and internally oriented of the freedoms and protects the ICCPR separate these inner freedoms, and pair three rights: the right to keep our thoughts private, freedom of thought and belief with conscience the right to keep them free from manipulation, and and religion, and freedom of opinion with the right to keep them free from penalty (Alegre expression.8 The Charter drafters. [...] For example, if party A sues the Parliament and government of Canada in party B for a breach of privacy, such as intrusion respect of all matters within the authority of on seclusion,23 then a court must consider Charter Parliament including all matters relating to the values in its interpretation and development of Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and the common law.24 This is not carte. [...] Major law reform is province in respect of all matters within the the responsibility of legislatures, not courts,25 authority of the legislature of each province.”15 and any development of the common law by courts must be incremental. [...] parties to ensure that persons are protected from any acts of private persons or entities that would impair the enjoyment of the freedoms of opinion and expression to the extent that these Covenant rights are amenable to application Conclusion between private persons or entities.”40 At the moment, freedom of thought, belief and At the time the ICCPR was drafted, states opinion are not only “forgot. [...] This project has been funded by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC); the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the OPC.
Pages
8
Published in
Canada