This study aims to discuss the following research question: How have the rise of social media and advancements in AI technology transformed the dynamics of disinformation, and what are the implications for democratic institutions and electoral integrity? 2 2 . [...] By understanding the dynamics of social media, the nature of disinformation, and the implications of generative AI, policymakers and civil servants can develop more effective strategies to protect democratic institutions and promote a well-informed public. [...] This underscores the need for a multifaceted approach, combining technological, educational, and regulatory measures to combat the spread of disinformation and protect the integrity of public discourse. [...] This includes developing clear, precise definitions of disinformation, ensuring transparency in the creation and enforcement of 21 disinformation laws, and fostering public dialogue to build consensus on the boundaries of free speech and the need for regulation. [...] In 2018, the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics of the House of Commons of the Canadian Parliament released the report "Democracy Under Threat: Risks and Solutions in the Era of Disinformation and Data Monopolies." (Zimmer, 2018).
Authors
Related Organizations
- Pages
- 33
- Published in
- Canada
Table of Contents
- NEW_AD_template_publication_pour-reflexion_en[18].pdf 1
- TWarin_Desinformation.pdf 5
- 4.1 Impacts of Scientific Disinformation 18
- 4.2 The Role of Social Media and Bots 19
- 4.3 Technological and Educational Solutions 19
- 4.4 Enhancing Public Understanding and Transparency 20
- 4.5 The Role of Policy and Regulation 20
- 4.6 Engaging with the Public 21
- 4.7 Fostering Transparency and Accountability 21
- 5.1 Network and Behavioral Analysis 22
- 5.2 Image and Video Verification 22
- 5.3 Cross-Referencing and Source Verification 22
- 5.4 Challenges and Benefits in Disinformation Detection 23
- 5.5 News Literacy and Public Education 23
- 6.1 Defining Disinformation and Legal Challenges 25
- 6.2 Case Studies and Legal Precedents 26
- 6.3 International Approaches 27