cover image: Multiple Marketing Mechanisms and the Performance of Multi-Unit Demand Sequential Auctions : The Case of Quebec Hog Market

20.500.12592/grbpp7

Multiple Marketing Mechanisms and the Performance of Multi-Unit Demand Sequential Auctions : The Case of Quebec Hog Market

19 Dec 2011

I would also like to express my gratitude to the teachers, researchers and the administrative staff of the Centre for Research in the Economics of Agri-food (CRÉA) at the University Laval. [...] Clearly the differences between the first three valuations and the fourth one must be large compared to the differences between the 4th and the 5th and 6th. [...] Bidder A knows that and the price for the second and third objects is the same: 03 which explains the flat segment. [...] The decreases in valuations from the k+l th object must be increasingly small relative to the decrease in valuation between the kth and (k+l)th objects as the number of objects auctioned increases, thus making asymmetric allocations more likely when the number of objects is large. [...] Starting at the bottom of the subgame tree of figure 2.4, we can see that the vector of gross payoffs when bidder A wins all four objects is (61; 0; 0), which is simply the sum of the valuations for the objects won by the bidders.

Authors

Jeddy, Mohamed

Pages
125
Published in
Canada
Title in English
Multiple Marketing Mechanisms and the Performance of Multi-Unit Demand Sequential Auctions: The Case of Quebec Hog Market

Tables

All