Data assessment and framing of an analysis of substantive equality through

With the data provided by ISC, IFSD could not assess the application of Jordan’s Principle to address issues of substantive equality and equality Using the vision of holistic well-being in the To estimate the cost of Jordan’s Principle into the future, IFSD proposes two Measuring to Thrive framework, what data and approaches: approaches would be necessary to assess 1. [...] There is occasional cross-fertilization between the two streams of jurisprudence.8 Jurisprudence relating to human rights laws has enriched the interpretation of section 15 of the Charter and vice-versa.9  Case law relating to section of 15 of the Charter and human rights laws recognizes that differential treatment may sometimes be necessary to respond to the contextual needs of disadvantaged grou. [...] 13 To provide guidance in the assessment of requests, ISC defined nine questions with consideration of the goal of substantive equality.40 ISC indicates that its approach to substantive equality is inspired by the Touchstones of Hope.41 The five principles in the Touchstones of Hope are meant to reflect the unique contexts of Indigenous peoples and guide engagement with them: self-determination; c. [...] The analysis of Jordan’s Principle being undertaken by IFSD was part of the Agreement-in-Principle on the long-term reform of child and family services being negotiated by the parties to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). [...] (This information was requested to cover the period prior to the use of the GC Case system and was used to test the consistency of inductive analysis from the primary datasets for fiscal years 2019–20 and 2020–21).