Further, it explores the rationale and objectives of the Scientific and Economic Foundations report based on the extent of positive and negative externalities in ‘eco-agri-food systems’ and the lack of a coherent, universal framework, thus setting up the narrative and outline for the rest of the report. [...] TEEB is concerned with the why and the the loss of biodiversity and the failure to take protective how of valuing nature in and of itself, and understanding measures versus the costs of effective conservation”. [...] With this focus in mind, TEEB aims to provide a bridge of valuation knowledge and expertise between the TEEB’s initial phase catalysed activities to make the multi-disciplinary science of biodiversity and ecosystem impacts and dependencies of societies and public/ management and the interconnected arenas of private interests more visible in order to contribute to policymaking in the international,. [...] championed the ‘GDP of the Poor’ therein flagging the The top 100 externalities had an estimated cost of around particular dependence of the poorer segments of society US$4.7 trillion per year in terms of the environmental and on well-functioning ecosystems, and thus developing social costs of lost ecosystem services and pollution. [...] the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity [agreed in 2010]”, which specifically highlights efforts with What the “Natural Capital at Risk: The Top 100 Externalities respect to mainstreaming the integration of biodiversity of Business” and the food and beverage supplement within and across sectors.
- Pages
- 414
- Published in
- Canada
