Take the train and climb the social ladder The role of geographical mobility in the fight against inequality in Quebec

The situation worsened towards the end of the 20th century: remain at the bottom of the ladder as young people born at the start of the 1960s into a family at adults. [...] Therefore, in terms of age 16 reside outside a major urban centre and who have income level, the advantage that results from migration grown up in a family that is at the bottom of the varies according to the birth cohort, the region one is distribution of income, and secondly, an improvement in living in at age 16 and the percentile rank of parental the situation of young people from the same reg. [...] The situation worsened towards the end of the 20th century: remain at the bottom of the ladder as young people born at the start of the 1960s into a family at adults. [...] Therefore, in terms of age 16 reside outside a major urban centre and who have income level, the advantage that results from migration grown up in a family that is at the bottom of the varies according to the birth cohort, the region one is distribution of income, and secondly, an improvement in living in at age 16 and the percentile rank of parental the situation of young people from the same reg. [...] Therefore, in terms of age 16 reside outside a major urban centre and who have income level, the advantage that results from migration grown up in a family that is at the bottom of the varies according to the birth cohort, the region one is distribution of income, and secondly, an improvement in living in at age 16 and the percentile rank of parental the situation of young people from the same reg.