In the Section 3.3, we apply the Lustig and Higgins (2012) method and measure the contribution of each of the components to the variation in income using the Shapley decomposition. [...] The numerator is the result of the product of the number of permutations of the s rst components of S (s!) by the number of permutations of the other components not belonging to S and dierent from the kth, (N − s − 1)!. [...] On the same principle, for health-related subsidies, we considered the annual budget of the RAMED program in relation to the number of members in the same year, and allocated this amount to the households in the survey that declared they had a RAMED card.16. [...] Thus, in the case of urban households, the fall in the relative poverty line is greater than the rise in the incidence of poverty associated with the income tax introduction ((b) to (c)). [...] Share of the effect of each component in the variation of the Welfare indices Share of the effect of each component in the variation of the Welfare indices Share of the effect of each component in the variation of the Welfare indices -150 -100 -50 0 50 -100 -50 0 50 -100 -50 0 50 References Abdelkhalek, T.
- Pages
- 33
- Published in
- Canada
